
Appeals Court Panel Appears Skeptical of Trump’s Travel Ban
WASHINGTON — A three-judge federal appeals panel voiced skepticism on Tuesday at the Justice Department’s broad defense of President Trump’s targeted travel ban during arguments over how much power the president has to impose immigration restrictions based on national security concerns.
It was a lively but technical hearing on an issue that has gripped much of the country’s attention — and that of foreign allies and Middle East nations — for the past week. Issued without warning on Jan. 27, just a week after Mr. Trump took office, the executive order disrupted travel and drew protests at the nation’s airports by suspending entry for people from seven predominantly Muslim countries and limiting the nation’s refugee program.
No matter how the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rules — in an order that is expected within days — an appeal to the United States Supreme Court is likely. That court remains short-handed and could deadlock. A 4-to-4 tie in the Supreme Court would leave the appeals court’s ruling in place.
- Quality Assurance Engineer IIHudlLondon
- IFS Cloud Solution Architect, ManagerPwCHouston, Texas
- Zone Director, ILD Sales - SouthBoehringer- IngelheimRidgefield, CT, United States
- VP - OperationsFirstsourceRemote, Remote, US
- Managing Director, US REMS | VirginiaColliers InternationalRichmond, Virginia, United States of America